What is a consequence of a court declaring a term as unfair in a consumer contract?

When a court declares a term in a consumer contract to be unfair, the primary consequence is that this term cannot be enforced against consumers, which means it is considered void. However, the overall validity of the remaining parts of the contract is maintained. This concept is rooted in the principle that not all elements of an agreement should be invalidated simply because one part is deemed unfair. Hence, the remainder of the contract can still be effective and legally binding. This helps to preserve the intentions of both parties involved in the agreement, allowing them to continue with the contract while disregarding the unfair term.

The other options do not accurately reflect the legal implications of a term being ruled unfair. For instance, the enforcement of the unfair term against consumers is not permissible, and there are no immediate obligations for all traders to change their contracts universally. Furthermore, being declared unfair does not exempt a trader from potential fines or other consequences for including such terms in their contracts.